APQN Members
Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Ekonomi Manajemen Bisnis dan Akuntansi (LAMEMBA) or Institute of Accreditation for Economics, Management, Business and Accounting Programs (IA EMBA)
Membership Type: Full
Email: info@lamemba.or.id
Year in which Organisation/Agency commenced operations: 2022, Jakarta
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Title: Prof
First Name: Ina
Surname: Primiana
Email Id: ina.primiana@lamemba.or.id
Nominated Contact Person (if different from CEO)
Title: Prof
First Name: Christantius
Surname: Dwiatmadja
Email Id: christantius.dwiatmadja@lamemba.or.id
Organisation Details
Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Ekonomi Manajemen Bisnis dan Akuntansi (LAMEMBA) or Institute of Accreditation for Economics, Management, Business and Acco
Address: CIBIS Park, CIBIS Nine, Jl. TB Simatupang No.2, East Cilandak., Pasar. Minggu, South Jakarta, Jakarta 12560
Indonesia
Website: https://lamemba.or.id/
Additional Contacts
Name 1: Aris Firmansyah
Email 1: arisfirmansyah215@gmail.com
Name 2: Aditia Febriansyah
Email 2: adit.febrian2802@gmail.com
Name 3: Gracinta Putri
Email 3: gracinta.gg@ gmail.com
Criteria Requirements for Full Member
1 Criterion: Nature of the operations of the agency:
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary
education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary
education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Description: LAMEMBA is an independent accreditation body that is entrusted with the authority by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education to undertake the accreditation process for Study Programs majoring in Economics, Management, Business, and Accounting (EMBA) in Indonesia.
According to:
1. Regulation of The Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. Number 5 Of 2020 On the Accreditation for Study Program and Higher Education. Article 4 Section 1 concerning 'Accreditation for Study Program run by LAM (Independent Accreditation Body)’.
2. Regulation of The Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. Number. AHU-0011772.AH.01.07 Of 2020 On the Ratification of the Establishment of the Legal Body of Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi.
3. Regulation of Badan Akreditasi Nasional (BAN)-Perguruan Tinggi (PT) Number 9 Of 2020
On the Diversion Policy of the Accreditation for Study Program from the National Accreditation Board for Higher Education to the Independent Accreditation Body
It was initiated by Ikatan Sarjana Ekonomi Indonesia (ISEI), the Institute of Indonesia Chartered Accountants (IAI), and the Association of Indonesian Faculty of Economics and Business (AFEBI). Since 2022, the function of BAN-PT in the accreditation process for the EMBA field (with a total of around 4000 study programs) has been transferred to us. Therefore, at the beginning of 2022, LAMEMBA has officially begun to receive applications from many study programs under the supervision of BAN-PT.
According to:
1. Regulation of The Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. Number 5 Of 2020 On the Accreditation for Study Program and Higher Education. Article 4 Section 1 concerning 'Accreditation for Study Program run by LAM (Independent Accreditation Body)’.
2. Regulation of The Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. Number. AHU-0011772.AH.01.07 Of 2020 On the Ratification of the Establishment of the Legal Body of Lembaga Akreditasi Mandiri Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi.
3. Regulation of Badan Akreditasi Nasional (BAN)-Perguruan Tinggi (PT) Number 9 Of 2020
On the Diversion Policy of the Accreditation for Study Program from the National Accreditation Board for Higher Education to the Independent Accreditation Body
It was initiated by Ikatan Sarjana Ekonomi Indonesia (ISEI), the Institute of Indonesia Chartered Accountants (IAI), and the Association of Indonesian Faculty of Economics and Business (AFEBI). Since 2022, the function of BAN-PT in the accreditation process for the EMBA field (with a total of around 4000 study programs) has been transferred to us. Therefore, at the beginning of 2022, LAMEMBA has officially begun to receive applications from many study programs under the supervision of BAN-PT.
Documents Upload: Download '01 Peraturan-BAN-PT-Nomor-9-2020-Kebijakan-Pengalihan-Akreditasi-BAN-PT-ke-LAM_Final.pdf'
2 Criterion: Mission statement and objectives:
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Description:
Our mission is to develop the capacity and competitiveness of study programs, implement the new paradigm of the accreditation assessment process, and increase the relevance and contribution in the academic atmosphere both at a national and international level. In line with our vision is to become the best accreditation institution for a study program in the fields of Economics, Management, Business, and Accounting (EMBA), which is nationally and internationally recognized, we intend to pursue more insight through collaboration with international accreditation institutions and join the membership of an international network.
Our mission is to develop the capacity and competitiveness of study programs, implement the new paradigm of the accreditation assessment process, and increase the relevance and contribution in the academic atmosphere both at a national and international level. In line with our vision is to become the best accreditation institution for a study program in the fields of Economics, Management, Business, and Accounting (EMBA), which is nationally and internationally recognized, we intend to pursue more insight through collaboration with international accreditation institutions and join the membership of an international network.
Documents Upload: Download '02 Vision and Mission LAMEMBA.pdf'
3 Criterion: Agency staff, Numbers, Profile, Roles:
Measure: The profile of the staff is consistent with the Mission Statement
Measure: The profile of the staff is consistent with the Mission Statement
Description:
Accreditation Council
No
Name
Institution
Roles
1.
Prof. Dr. Dian Agustia
Universitas Airlangga
Chief Of Accreditation Council
2.
Dr. Mery Citra Sondari
Universitas Padjajaran
Accreditation Council
3.
Prof. Dr. Hermanto Siregar
Institur Pertanian Bogor
Accreditation Council
4.
Prof. Dr. Nunuy Nur Afiah
Universitas Padjajaran
Accreditation Council
5.
BM Purwanto, Ph.D
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Accreditation Council
6.
Aldrin Herwany, Ph.D
Institut Perbanas Jakarta
Accreditation Council
7.
Dr. Aviliani
Institut Perbanas Jakarta
Accreditation Council
8.
Prof. Dr. Rudi Purwono SE., M. SE
Universitas Airlangga
Accreditation Council
9.
Prof. Dr. Khomsiyah
Universitas Trisakti
Accreditation Council
Executive Board
No
Name
Institution
Roles
1.
Prof. Dr. Ina Primiana
Universitas Padjajaran
Chief of Executive Board
2.
Prof. Eddy R. Rasyid, PhD., CA
Universitas Andalas
Executive Board
3.
Prof. Christantius Dwiatmadja, Ph.D.
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Executive Board
4.
Dr. Ahyar Yuniawan
Universitas Diponegoro
Executive Board
5.
Prof. Dr. Ria Mardiana Yusuf
Universitas Hasanudin
Executive Board
Accreditation Council
No
Name
Institution
Roles
1.
Prof. Dr. Dian Agustia
Universitas Airlangga
Chief Of Accreditation Council
2.
Dr. Mery Citra Sondari
Universitas Padjajaran
Accreditation Council
3.
Prof. Dr. Hermanto Siregar
Institur Pertanian Bogor
Accreditation Council
4.
Prof. Dr. Nunuy Nur Afiah
Universitas Padjajaran
Accreditation Council
5.
BM Purwanto, Ph.D
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Accreditation Council
6.
Aldrin Herwany, Ph.D
Institut Perbanas Jakarta
Accreditation Council
7.
Dr. Aviliani
Institut Perbanas Jakarta
Accreditation Council
8.
Prof. Dr. Rudi Purwono SE., M. SE
Universitas Airlangga
Accreditation Council
9.
Prof. Dr. Khomsiyah
Universitas Trisakti
Accreditation Council
Executive Board
No
Name
Institution
Roles
1.
Prof. Dr. Ina Primiana
Universitas Padjajaran
Chief of Executive Board
2.
Prof. Eddy R. Rasyid, PhD., CA
Universitas Andalas
Executive Board
3.
Prof. Christantius Dwiatmadja, Ph.D.
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Executive Board
4.
Dr. Ahyar Yuniawan
Universitas Diponegoro
Executive Board
5.
Prof. Dr. Ria Mardiana Yusuf
Universitas Hasanudin
Executive Board
4 Criterion: Profile of reviewers:
Measure: The profile of the reviewers is consistent with the Mission Statement
Measure: The profile of the reviewers is consistent with the Mission Statement
Description:
To be able to carry out its duties and authority in accrediting EMBA study programs for all levels of education, LAMEMBA needs to have a number of colleagues who are ready to be assigned as assessors. This regulation regarding guidelines for managing a number of assessors, which consist of requirements, recruitment and selection of prospective assessors, the administration, assignment, performance evaluation, training and development, code of ethics, and dismissal process of assessors. Therefore, the guideline is addressed for any parties with an interest in the accreditation process carried out by LAMEMBA.
To be able to carry out its duties and authority in accrediting EMBA study programs for all levels of education, LAMEMBA needs to have a number of colleagues who are ready to be assigned as assessors. This regulation regarding guidelines for managing a number of assessors, which consist of requirements, recruitment and selection of prospective assessors, the administration, assignment, performance evaluation, training and development, code of ethics, and dismissal process of assessors. Therefore, the guideline is addressed for any parties with an interest in the accreditation process carried out by LAMEMBA.
5 Criterion: Independence:
Measure: The judgements and recommendations of the agency’s reports cannot be changed by third parties
Measure: The judgements and recommendations of the agency’s reports cannot be changed by third parties
Description: The submitted documents were undertaken by two peers or assessors. The Accreditation Committee then validates the assessment result of this desk assessment to decide whether to proceed to the next stage. The next stage which is an on-site assessment conducted by two assessors who will then recommend whether it could be granted a Good, Very Good, or Excellent ranking. The Accreditation Committee then validates the result of this on-site assessment with two assessors. The final process involves the Executive Boards and the Accreditation Council will approve the final decision of accreditation ranking as Good, Very Good, or Excellent.
6 Criterion: Resources:
Measure: The agency has sufficient resources to run its operations in accordance with its mission statement and objectives
Measure: The agency has sufficient resources to run its operations in accordance with its mission statement and objectives
Description: LAMEMBA has established an office at CIBIS Park, CIBIS Nine, Jl. TB Simatupang No.2, East Cilandak., Pasar. Minggu, South Jakarta, Jakarta 12560, and equipped with
Standard (Instrument)
IT Infrastructure called LEXA and YATA
20 Employees and 2 Part-Time Employees
Standard (Instrument)
IT Infrastructure called LEXA and YATA
20 Employees and 2 Part-Time Employees
7 Criterion: External quality assurance criteria and processes:
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Description:
The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education and National Accreditation Agency for Higher Education conducted an external review of LAMEMBA by looking at its operations and accredited study programs.
The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education and National Accreditation Agency for Higher Education conducted an external review of LAMEMBA by looking at its operations and accredited study programs.
8 Criterion: Quality assurance:
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Description: LAMEMBA Assessment Process
Assessment is carried out based on a self-evaluation document or report, hereinafter referred to as DED, in which the Program Study Management Unit describes the results of its comprehensive self-evaluation related to the performance of the program study within the last three years in accordance with the LAMEMBA Instrument. In addition, the assessment also uses study program performance documents that show statistical data on several aspects of study program performance as required by the LAMEMBA Accreditation instrument, hereinafter referred to as DKPS.
The accreditation process starts with verifying the completion and suitability of the submitted documents (DED and DKPS). This stage is followed by a desk assessment of the documents undertaken by two peers or assessors. The Accreditation Committee then validates the assessment result of this desk assessment. The committee will decide whether to proceed to the next stage, which is an on-site assessment conducted by two assessors who will then recommend whether it could be granted a Good, Very Good, or Excellent ranking. The Accreditation Committee then validates the result of this on-site assessment. This final step will approve the final decision of accreditation ranking as Good, Very Good, or Excellent.
Assessment is carried out based on a self-evaluation document or report, hereinafter referred to as DED, in which the Program Study Management Unit describes the results of its comprehensive self-evaluation related to the performance of the program study within the last three years in accordance with the LAMEMBA Instrument. In addition, the assessment also uses study program performance documents that show statistical data on several aspects of study program performance as required by the LAMEMBA Accreditation instrument, hereinafter referred to as DKPS.
The accreditation process starts with verifying the completion and suitability of the submitted documents (DED and DKPS). This stage is followed by a desk assessment of the documents undertaken by two peers or assessors. The Accreditation Committee then validates the assessment result of this desk assessment. The committee will decide whether to proceed to the next stage, which is an on-site assessment conducted by two assessors who will then recommend whether it could be granted a Good, Very Good, or Excellent ranking. The Accreditation Committee then validates the result of this on-site assessment. This final step will approve the final decision of accreditation ranking as Good, Very Good, or Excellent.
Criteria Requirements for Institutional Member
Institutional Member Criteria:
Measure: Institutional Members are institutions of higher education in the region that are in good standing with the relevant quality assurance agency if one exists.
Measure: Institutional Members are institutions of higher education in the region that are in good standing with the relevant quality assurance agency if one exists.
Proof of recognition as a Higher Education Institution: Applicable Only For Institutional Members
Proof of the organisation’s good standing with the local QA agency: Applicable Only For Institutional Members
Criteria Requirements for Associate Member
Associate Member Criteria:
Measure:Associate Members are organisations with a major interest and active involvement in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education, but without the responsibility for assuring the quality of institutions, education programs, or external quality assurance agencies
Measure:Associate Members are organisations with a major interest and active involvement in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education, but without the responsibility for assuring the quality of institutions, education programs, or external quality assurance agencies
Applicable Only For Associate Members
Criteria Requirements for Intermediate Member
1 Criterion: Nature of the operations of the agency:
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Description: Applicable Only For Intermediate Members
2 Criterion: Mission statement and objectives:
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Applicable Only For Intermediate Members
3 Criterion: :
Proof of the organisation’s good standing with the local QA agency
Proof of the organisation’s good standing with the local QA agency
Applicable Only For Intermediate Members
Criteria Requirements for Observer
Criterion For Observers:
Measure: APQN accepts as Observers organisations outside the Asia-Pacific region, including: external quality assurance agencies; institutions with a major interest in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education; other regional networks that have major interests in and strong links with the region
Measure: APQN accepts as Observers organisations outside the Asia-Pacific region, including: external quality assurance agencies; institutions with a major interest in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education; other regional networks that have major interests in and strong links with the region
Criteria Requirements for Observer: Applicable Only For Observers
Documentation and Fees
Additional Information: No additional information is required for my application
Upon approval of my application I agree to pay:
- $500 (Initial Joining Fee: Full Member, Intermediate Member, Associate Member)
- $300 Member Fee: Full Member, Intermediate Member (if not INQAAHE Member)
I will be applying for support for: Both Initial Joining Fee and Membership Fee
Documents Submitted
01 Peraturan-BAN-PT-Nomor-9-2020-Kebijakan-Pengalihan-Akreditasi-BAN-PT-ke-LAM_Final.pdf02 Vision and Mission LAMEMBA.pdf
03 Criterion_ Agency staff, Numbers, Profile, Roles.pdf
04 Name of Assessor or Reviewer.pdf
05 PERATURAN LAMEMBA NO. 2 TH 2021 TENTANG MEKANISME AKREDITASI.pdf
06 Sarana Prasarana.pdf
07 Laporan LAMEMBA Tahun Kegiatan 2022.pdf
Located in: APQN Members
